标题： 同行评审中的隐藏行为与隐藏信息：一种动态解决方案 显示英文标题

标题： Hidden Actions and Hidden Information in Peer Review: A Dynamic Solution

摘要： 我们开发了一个简单的科学同行评审过程模型，其中不同能力的作者投入以产生不同质量的论文，期刊根据一个有噪声的信号来评估论文，并决定接受或拒绝每篇论文。 我们发现，即使期刊不知道作者类型和努力程度，最优结果是当评估技术完善时的极限情况。 然后，我们考虑期刊允许作者挑战初始拒绝的情况，并发现这种同行评审方法相对于不允许此类挑战的方法，其结果更接近最优结果。 显示英文摘要

摘要： We develop a simple model of the scientific peer review process, in which authors of varying ability invest to produce papers of varying quality, and journals evaluate papers based on a noisy signal, choosing to accept or reject each paper. We find that the first-best outcome is the limiting case as the evaluation technology is perfected, even though author type and effort are not known to the journal. Then, we consider the case where journals allow authors to challenge an initial rejection, and find that this approach to peer review yields an outcome closer to the first best relative to the approach that does not allow for such challenges.