标题： 按需移动与固定路线公共交通系统：对低收入社区旅行者偏好的评估 显示英文标题

标题： Mobility-on-demand versus fixed-route transit systems: an evaluation of traveler preferences in low-income communities

摘要： 新兴的交通技术，如拼车服务和自动驾驶车辆，正在颠覆交通行业并改变公共交通。 一些交通观察者设想未来的公共交通将是集成的交通系统，固定路线服务沿着主要通道运行，而按需拼车服务则覆盖低密度区域。 然而，从传统的固定路线服务模式转向这种集成的按需交通系统，可能会引起当地居民的不同反应。 本文评估了乘客对拟议的集成按需交通系统与现有固定路线系统的偏好，特别关注弱势乘客。 我们在美国两个资源匮乏的社区进行了调查，即密歇根州的底特律和伊普西兰蒂。 大多数受访者更倾向于按需交通系统而不是固定路线系统。 根据有序逻辑模型的结果，我们发现男性、大学毕业生、从未听说过或使用过拼车服务的人以及目前获得的公共交通服务较差的人对按需交通系统有更强的偏好。 相比之下，年龄、收入、种族或残疾状况对偏好影响不大。 调查受访者认为按需交通系统最重要的好处是增强了前往不同目的地的交通可达性，而他们的主要担忧包括需要主动请求乘车、可能的交通费用上涨以及潜在的技术故障。 解决女性乘客的担忧并满足技术不熟练人士的需求，应成为考虑实施按需交通计划的公共交通机构的主要优先事项。 显示英文摘要

摘要： Emerging transportation technologies, such as ride-hailing and autonomous vehicles, are disrupting the transportation sector and transforming public transit. Some transit observers envision future public transit to be integrated transit systems with fixed-route services running along major corridors and on-demand ridesharing services covering lower-density areas. A switch from a conventional fixed-route service model to this kind of integrated mobility-on-demand transit system, however, may elicit varied responses from local residents. This paper evaluates traveler preferences for a proposed integrated mobility-on-demand transit system versus the existing fixed-route system, with a particular focus on disadvantaged travelers. We conducted a survey in two low-resource communities in the United States, namely, Detroit and Ypsilanti, Michigan. A majority of survey respondents preferred a mobility-on-demand transit system over a fixed-route one. Based on ordered logit model outputs, we found a stronger preference for mobility-on-demand transit among males, college graduates, individuals who have never heard of or used ride-hailing before, and individuals who currently receive inferior transit services. By contrast, preferences varied little by age, income, race, or disability status. The most important benefit of a mobility-on-demand transit system perceived by the survey respondents is enhanced transit accessibility to different destinations, whereas their major concerns include the need to actively request rides, possible transit-fare increases, and potential technological failures. Addressing the concerns of female riders and accommodating the needs of less technology-proficient individuals should be major priorities for transit agencies that are considering mobility-on-demand initiatives.