标题： 高AGI与低AGI：地缘政治一致性的本体论与概念分类学 显示英文标题

标题： High vs. Low AGI: Ontology and Conceptual Taxonomy for Geopolitical Coherence

摘要： 人工智能通用智能（AGI）研究的快速发展要求具有概念工具，能够区分用于开放、商业集成的系统和用于主权、安全化部署的系统。 没有这些区别，风险评估和监管辩论会将AGI归入过时的双重用途框架，这些框架不适合这些资源，虽然捕捉了民用和军用应用的可能性，但忽略了由企业级和国家级架构产生的不同社会渊源。 本文提出了一种分类法，用于区分低AGI和高AGI，阐明了商业经济和安全主权架构不仅可以通过功能，还可以通过产生它们的社会和政治生态系统来区分。 该分类法建立在国际关系中“高/低政治”的概念上，通过构念层次理论的视角来看，使其甚至能够捕捉到在AGI日益增长的地缘政治利益背景下合作与冲突可能共存的情况。 通过将AGI嵌入权力结构和安全化理论中，这一贡献通过本体分类法扩展了双重用途的讨论，使风险评估和治理设计更加细致——为政策制定者和研究人员提供工具，以预见国际体系中的安全困境、制度需求和技术-政治溢出效应。 显示英文摘要

摘要： The rapid progression of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) research demands conceptual tools capable of distinguishing between systems developed for open, commercial integration and those destined for sovereign, securitized deployments. Without such distinctions, risk assessments and regulatory debates collapse AGI into legacy dual-use frameworks that are ill-suited for these resources, capturing the possibility of civilian and military application but overlooking the distinct societal lineages yielded by corporate and state-grade architectures. This paper proposes a taxonomy distinguishing low-AGI and high-AGI, clarifying how commercial-economic and security-sovereign architectures can be distinguished not only by function, but by the social and political ecosystems that produce them. The taxonomy builds on international relations concepts of "high/low politics," viewed through the lens of construal-level theory, which allows it to even capture how cooperation and conflict may coexist in the context of AGI's emerging geopolitical stakes. By embedding AGI within power structures and securitization theory, this contribution extends dual-use discourse through an ontological taxonomy that enables more granular risk assessment and governance design--equipping policymakers and researchers to anticipate security dilemmas, institutional demands, and technical-political spillovers in the international system.